estiva whatsapp
header insight

Gain New Insights

Back to insight list
Dynamic Routing vs. Static Routing: Which Is More Efficient for Modern Logistics Operations?
efisiensi logistik

In today’s digital era, delivery efficiency is a key factor for logistics companies to stay competitive. One of the most critical elements in the supply chain is routing—the planning of delivery routes. Generally, there are two main approaches used: static routing (fixed routes) and dynamic routing (real-time, AI-driven routes). Each method has its own strengths and challenges, but which one is truly more efficient for modern logistics?

Static Routing: Simple and Stable, but Less Adaptive

Static routing involves pre-determined, fixed delivery routes. These routes are planned in advance, typically based on the shortest or fastest theoretical path, and only updated manually when necessary.

Advantages:

  • Easy to implement. Ideal for regular, repetitive routes—such as deliveries from warehouse to branch stores.
  • Stable and predictable. Suitable for long-term planning and scheduling.

Disadvantages:

  • Unresponsive to real-time conditions. It doesn’t account for traffic jams, weather disruptions, or sudden changes on the ground.
  • Less flexible for urgent or unscheduled deliveries.

Dynamic Routing: Smart and Adaptive with AI Technology

Dynamic routing, on the other hand, leverages real-time data from GPS, vehicle sensors, traffic conditions, and AI algorithms to automatically adjust routes on the fly.

Advantages:

  • Responsive to changes. AI helps determine the best routes in real time, avoiding congestion or high-risk delays.
  • Time and cost efficiency. Reduces fuel consumption, improves delivery accuracy, and optimizes fleet utilization.
  • Highly scalable. Ideal for complex or high-volume delivery scenarios.

Disadvantages:

  • Requires technology investment. Needs advanced GPS, IoT systems, and integrated software.
  • Operational complexity. Demands skilled personnel and systems to manage data quickly and effectively.

Which Is More Efficient?

The answer depends on your operational needs. Static routing remains useful for scheduled and stable operations. However, in dynamic logistics environments with unpredictable factors like traffic and demand changes, dynamic routing is clearly the more efficient and adaptive choice.

How Does PT SPIL Apply Dynamic Routing?

PT SPIL (Salam Pacific Indonesia Lines) has embraced a modern approach to routing and fleet management. Through digital platforms like MySPIL Reloaded and data-driven system integration, PT SPIL efficiently manages multimodal deliveries—combining sea, land, and local distribution—in real time.

By utilizing AI-driven technology and smart notifications, customers receive more accurate and flexible delivery updates. This aligns perfectly with the concept of dynamic routing, where efficiency and adaptability to on-ground conditions are key.



Category
spilcoid
Share
No insight available at the moment.
Latest Insights